Why a $1B Unicorn Aims for 10x, Not 10%

Fieldguide prices on the results customers achieve rather than seat count, and put its first office outside the US in Seoul, CEO Jin Chang told the room.

Share
Why a $1B Unicorn Aims for 10x, Not 10%

Set the goal at 10x rather than 10 percent and it actually gets easier: great people gather around big goals, and few competitors attempt challenges that bold.

📅 July 21, 2026
🤝 Bloom × Fieldguide × D.CAMP × ex-Google
🎤 Jin Chang, CEO of Fieldguide · Kibum Kim, Terminal X

10x is easier than 10 percent

The difference between Silicon Valley and Korea is not skill but the way of thinking. Like Larry Page asking why not 100x, setting the goal at 10x changes two things. First, exceptional talent gathers, the way people flock to a company promising human-level AI. Second, so few people attempt challenges that large that competition thins out. Ten percent growth means fighting over one percent in a crowded market; a 10x goal reveals an entirely new road.

A large auditorium filled with attendees facing a speaker beside a green slide

The founder must be the customer

The most common reason startups fail is building what customers do not want. When the founder is the customer, that misalignment disappears. And one more thing: an idea everyone already agrees is good is already late. Investors called Fieldguide a bad idea in the early days, and five years later, imitators poured out.

Legacy SaaS fades; companies priced on customer success survive

The crisis of software subscription businesses is real: the old subscription model struggles to survive. But the true problem is not the model, it is the assumption underneath. Fieldguide is also subscription-based, and it prices on the results customers actually achieve rather than seat count. Charging per seat creates the strange structure where the vendor earns more only if the customer hires more, and in an era short of people to hire, that structure collapses. Hence the proposal: let AI do the work instead of people. Subscription or usage-based, the company that prices on customer success wins in the end.

Global expansion happens on foot

The fastest road abroad is open source: from tonight, world-class engineers review your code, your skills grow, connections form, and hiring follows. And for a serious run at the US market there is one answer: headquarters in San Francisco, where, as the saying goes, there is an investor in the coffee shop and another across the street. Still, the right place differs by role: founders and engineers belong in Silicon Valley, while enterprise salespeople belong wherever their customers actually are.

Culture and leadership cannot be added later

Postpone culture as a later problem and the company cannot be designed properly. Fieldguide wrote down its values before building the product, and repeats that the people in this room today create the culture for everyone who joins after. Leadership is the same: a company started for the wrong reasons, pride or a higher valuation, loses its founder first when the hard moment comes. What stays to the end is neither money nor team but yourself, so choosing the uncomfortable road now is never a loss.

Two speakers with mics on stools, the wall behind them filled with the live bilingual transcript

Silicon Valley walked to Seoul

The first Fieldguide office outside the US is in Seoul, and not as a support team or branch: as a central hub for AI product development aimed at the world. Until now we always traveled to Silicon Valley to learn; this time Silicon Valley came to us first. The line Goldman Sachs left while investing in this unicorn captures the shift: we did not persuade them, they persuaded us.

Six participants in the auditorium seats holding up thumbs and V signs

Keep reading


Join Bloom

Bloom builds offline rooms where people and technology meet. We run them in Seoul, and now beyond it.

Read more

일론 머스크와 샘 올트먼의 흑백 사진

한국에선 2030년 대담을 나눌 자리가 없다

같은 2030년, 다른 체감 오후에 만난 개발자 친구는 AI와 상관없는 일을 하는 친구들을 만나면 늘 이렇게 말한다고 했다. 2030년쯤 되면 우리는 AI에게 대체되느냐 마느냐가 아니라, AI를 사람으로 볼지 말지를 이야기하고 있을 거야. 개발자 친구는 지금의 AI 논의가 상당히 피상적이라고 봤다. 많은 전문가도 삶이 바빠 시야가 얕고, 최근 AI와 전혀 상관없는

By Bloom
“AI SLOP” 글자와 녹아내리는 캐릭터들이 그려진 일러스트

AI 시대에는 신뢰가 병목이다

AI가 만든 것들에 점점 피로감을 느낀다는 미국에서 막 돌아온 창업자와 점심을 먹었다. 요즘은 스타트업들이 PR 자료를 AI로 대충 만들어 뿌리는 경우가 많아졌는데, 그런 자료는 결국 효과가 형편없을 거라는 이야기였다. 살짝 AI slop 느낌 나는 순간 저 그냥 안 보거든요. 그는 AI가 쓴 티가 나는 글은 신뢰가 확 떨어진다고 했다. 나는

By Bloom