Why Korea Embraced Claude Blue: The FOMO Pattern

Critic Woojin Cha fed decades of his own columns into a model and runs about ten projects at once, and reads Korea's AI rush as the Bitcoin pattern.

Share
Why Korea Embraced Claude Blue: The FOMO Pattern
Koreans are not like this only with AI. It was the same with Bitcoin, the same with real estate, the same every time a new platform opened.
People were not excited because they were curious about Silicon Valley trends. The feeling of falling behind if they skipped this was already there.

This post is based on a conversation with tech and entertainment critic Woojin Cha.

Feeding decades of columns to a model

As a non-developer, he started digging into AI seriously last September. Engineers around him advised that it was still a transitional period and he could catch up once things settled, so he let it go for a while. Then word came that a new model had jumped in capability, he picked it back up, and now runs about ten projects at once.

One of them stood out, the one where he fed the model every column he has written over decades, and because those columns were never written to a fixed theory or formula, he asked the model to work backwards and theorize them. The old process went from gathering sources and insights to notes to a skeleton to the finished column. Once that theorization becomes an agent, the middle disappears, so notes go in and a column comes out.

The next experiment is persona mixing, where you blend your own insight and writing style with those of someone else, like a DJ, to create a third expert persona. It used to take years for a philosophy person to write about mechanical engineering, since you had to study the field deeply and then fuse two disciplines, and now you can borrow the expertise of each field and combine it, like producing infinite remixes of a track. He compared AI to a gifted child, and said his biggest question these days is how to use that boundless potential.

Ethics came down to the individual

That led to why personal AI ethics now matters more. Ethics used to be the responsibility of leaders and executives, and with every individual using AI, the burden has come down to the individual level.

Training on your own writing seems ethically clean, though someone could still question its purity, and the boundary blurs further once you use the writing of others as material. The real issue is that AI users all over the world are doing the same thing, mixing each other to make something new. The conclusion was that the AI era needs a rebuilt definition of what is ethical, a new normal for ethics, because declaring that ethics matters is not enough.

It was the same with Bitcoin

We asked why it spread so intensely in Korea in particular, and the answer was crisp: Koreans are not like this only with AI. People who entered Bitcoin and NFTs early actually made money, and people who entered late lost it, so live through that once and the instinct to follow fast, unconditionally, hardens.

The YouTube market is already late, so when a new platform opens, the same scene repeats and day-one guides to ten thousand followers pour out. The sense that money goes to whoever enters the new space first was learned in real estate before Bitcoin ever arrived. Search AI today and the thumbnails overflow with skip this and regret it forever, a once-in-a-century opportunity, and anyone carrying memories of missed chances feels the clock start ticking.

Leave the track and you cannot return

Why is Korea especially sensitive to it? The sense that once you leave the track you can never get back on runs deep, so people strain not to fall out of the mainstream. Cha saw it similarly, that Korea is unusually hurried and people in their thirties struggle most. A longer life could mean more chances, but instead it reads as live long, and failing to board early becomes catastrophic.

So the conclusion settled like this. People were not excited about Silicon Valley trends, and not amazed by AI. The feeling of falling behind already lived in everyone, and it finally got a name.

Keep reading


Join Bloom

Bloom builds offline rooms where people and technology meet. We run them in Seoul, and now beyond it.

Read more

일론 머스크와 샘 올트먼의 흑백 사진

한국에선 2030년 대담을 나눌 자리가 없다

같은 2030년, 다른 체감 오후에 만난 개발자 친구는 AI와 상관없는 일을 하는 친구들을 만나면 늘 이렇게 말한다고 했다. 2030년쯤 되면 우리는 AI에게 대체되느냐 마느냐가 아니라, AI를 사람으로 볼지 말지를 이야기하고 있을 거야. 개발자 친구는 지금의 AI 논의가 상당히 피상적이라고 봤다. 많은 전문가도 삶이 바빠 시야가 얕고, 최근 AI와 전혀 상관없는

By Bloom
“AI SLOP” 글자와 녹아내리는 캐릭터들이 그려진 일러스트

AI 시대에는 신뢰가 병목이다

AI가 만든 것들에 점점 피로감을 느낀다는 미국에서 막 돌아온 창업자와 점심을 먹었다. 요즘은 스타트업들이 PR 자료를 AI로 대충 만들어 뿌리는 경우가 많아졌는데, 그런 자료는 결국 효과가 형편없을 거라는 이야기였다. 살짝 AI slop 느낌 나는 순간 저 그냥 안 보거든요. 그는 AI가 쓴 티가 나는 글은 신뢰가 확 떨어진다고 했다. 나는

By Bloom