Why Korea Embraced Claude Blue: The FOMO Pattern

Critic Woojin Cha fed decades of his own columns into a model and runs about ten projects at once, and reads Korea's AI rush as the Bitcoin pattern.

Share
Why Korea Embraced Claude Blue: The FOMO Pattern
Koreans are not like this only with AI. It was the same with Bitcoin, the same with real estate, the same every time a new platform opened.
People were not excited because they were curious about Silicon Valley trends. The feeling of falling behind if they skipped this was already there.

This post is based on a conversation with tech and entertainment critic Woojin Cha.

Feeding decades of columns to a model

As a non-developer, he started digging into AI seriously last September. Engineers around him advised that it was still a transitional period and he could catch up once things settled, so he let it go for a while. Then word came that a new model had jumped in capability, he picked it back up, and now runs about ten projects at once.

One of them stood out, the one where he fed the model every column he has written over decades, and because those columns were never written to a fixed theory or formula, he asked the model to work backwards and theorize them. The old process went from gathering sources and insights to notes to a skeleton to the finished column. Once that theorization becomes an agent, the middle disappears, so notes go in and a column comes out.

The next experiment is persona mixing, where you blend your own insight and writing style with those of someone else, like a DJ, to create a third expert persona. It used to take years for a philosophy person to write about mechanical engineering, since you had to study the field deeply and then fuse two disciplines, and now you can borrow the expertise of each field and combine it, like producing infinite remixes of a track. He compared AI to a gifted child, and said his biggest question these days is how to use that boundless potential.

Ethics came down to the individual

That led to why personal AI ethics now matters more. Ethics used to be the responsibility of leaders and executives, and with every individual using AI, the burden has come down to the individual level.

Training on your own writing seems ethically clean, though someone could still question its purity, and the boundary blurs further once you use the writing of others as material. The real issue is that AI users all over the world are doing the same thing, mixing each other to make something new. The conclusion was that the AI era needs a rebuilt definition of what is ethical, a new normal for ethics, because declaring that ethics matters is not enough.

It was the same with Bitcoin

We asked why it spread so intensely in Korea in particular, and the answer was crisp: Koreans are not like this only with AI. People who entered Bitcoin and NFTs early actually made money, and people who entered late lost it, so live through that once and the instinct to follow fast, unconditionally, hardens.

The YouTube market is already late, so when a new platform opens, the same scene repeats and day-one guides to ten thousand followers pour out. The sense that money goes to whoever enters the new space first was learned in real estate before Bitcoin ever arrived. Search AI today and the thumbnails overflow with skip this and regret it forever, a once-in-a-century opportunity, and anyone carrying memories of missed chances feels the clock start ticking.

Leave the track and you cannot return

Why is Korea especially sensitive to it? The sense that once you leave the track you can never get back on runs deep, so people strain not to fall out of the mainstream. Cha saw it similarly, that Korea is unusually hurried and people in their thirties struggle most. A longer life could mean more chances, but instead it reads as live long, and failing to board early becomes catastrophic.

So the conclusion settled like this. People were not excited about Silicon Valley trends, and not amazed by AI. The feeling of falling behind already lived in everyone, and it finally got a name.

Keep reading


Join Bloom

Bloom builds offline rooms where people and technology meet. We run them in Seoul, and now beyond it.

Read more

석양빛을 받은 샌프란시스코 금문교와 그 너머의 도시

샌프란시스코는 한 번 가 보면 안다

Bloom 행사를 하다 보면 유난히 기억에 남는 분들이 있다. 그런 분들은 내가 따로 커피챗을 요청한다. 그렇게 평일 저녁 삼성동 스타벅스에서 마주 앉게 된 사람이, 토스와 뱅크샐러드에서 시니어 개발자로 일하다 나와 창업한 고의성(Abel Ko) 님과 중학교 때부터 그의 친구로 미술 거래 사업을 하다 합류한 김민성(Mark Kim) 님이다. 둘은 Ironact라는

By Bloom
팀별 커밋 순위와 방금 올라온 커밋이 뜬 LED 아래에서 노트북으로 작업하는 해커톤 참가자들

Ambition for Korea 오픈소스로 공개합니다

Ambition for Korea 해커톤 운영 방식을 GitHub에 오픈소스로 공개합니다. https://github.com/patrickhan-coder/bloom-hackathon-kit 현장에서 “운영이 유니크하고 획기적이다”라는 피드백을 정말 많이 들었습니다. 그런데 저는 사실 해커톤에 한 번도 참가해 본 적이 없습니다. Bloom 행사에서 실습은 많이 했지만, 해커톤이라기보다는 빌더톤에 가까웠죠. 이번엔 본선 8팀 모두에게 팀당 5,

By Bloom